Environmental
Defense Working Group
BC Law Reform – Stop SLAPP
Suits
News Release
Burnaby May 26, 2015
A Real and
Present Danger:
B.C. Urgently
Needs Anti-SLAPP Legislation
The Environmental
Defense Working Group (EDRF) applauds the BC New Democratic Party for taking a
leadership role in proposing an anti-SLAPP Act to protect Charter rights in the
province. SLAPP suits, or Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation, are
becoming more common in Canada and experts agree there is an urgent need for
legislation to prevent them.[1] The
proposed Act will allow Judges greater flexibility to evaluate claims of
malicious lawsuits aimed at silencing and preventing protests against large
corporations. The proposed Act does not,
of course, protect unlawful conduct.
The
Act follows legislation in Quebec to stop SLAPP suits and protect Charter
rights and Bill 83, Protection of Public
Participation Act, 2013, which is presently before the Ontario legislature. 28 US states have
already adopted effective anti-SLAPP legislation to protect Constitutional
rights.[2]
SLAPP suits are lawsuits generally brought
by large corporations or government agencies to silence individuals and
community-based groups. The term SLAPP suit is used in part to describe a case
where the goal of the party bringing the lawsuit is generally not to win, but
to silence critics and deny them their Charter rights. [3] As
such, SLAPP suits threaten public participation and thereby the democratic
process in Canada.
The power of a SLAPP comes from the use of
the court system to intimidate individuals, communities, unions and civic
groups and to exhaust their often very limited resources. It is not the
strength of the lawsuit itself, but the threat of onerous and expensive legal
proceedings that makes SLAPPs so harmfully effective. SLAPP suits often require
enormous resources to defend against and can exhaust the resources of any
ordinary defendant. Activities that attract SLAPPs may include citizens
reporting of environmental violations, filing complaints with government
agencies, contacting the media, speaking at public meetings, participating at
hearings before administrative tribunals or engaging in public campaigns.[4]
There
are several lawsuits against protestors presently before the BC Supreme Court.[5]
But the most well known is the $5.6 million civil suit against five defendants
by Kinder Morgan the giant Texas based oil company. That suit was brought to an
abrupt conclusion when Kinder Morgan issued a unilateral discontinuance after
one defendant had argued in BC Supreme Court for a dismissal, recognition that
the civil suit was a SLAPP suit and special costs and was proposing to appeal Kinder
Morgan’s civil suit.
Alan Dutton was one of the five named in Kinder
Morgan’s lawsuit and notes that “the effect of a SLAPP suit is to silence
critics, deny freedom of speech and assembly along with other democratic
rights. SLAPP suits also destroy community organizations and exert a ‘chill
factor’ on important public discussion and non-violent peaceful protests.”
Alan
Dutton, a spokesperson for the EDRF, leads a law reform
project funded by West Coast Environmental Law aimed at bringing legal experts together
to evaluate solutions to SLAPP suits as well to engage the public in discussion
of Charter rights in the context of lawful public protests. Alan added “I
believe that "SLAPP suits represent a clear and present danger to Charter
rights in BC and we are glad that the NDP is taking the issue seriously and has
taken action by tabling a Bill to stop SLAPP suits."
The EDRF
urges all Parties in BC to support anti-SLAPP legislation. The EDRF and is
organizing a petition to encourage all elected officials to support the
proposed Act.
- 30 -
The Environmental Defense Working Group is a
newly formed group and has received two grants from West Coast Environmental
Law to develop a made-in-BC solution to SLAPP suits.
For more information, please contact Alan Dutton and the Environmental Defense Working Group at 604- 290-1108, or e-mail
aldutton@gmail.com.
[2] EcoJustice, “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP): Legislation
Urgently Needed in Ontario.”
[3] Michaelin and
Chris Tollefson, “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation: The British
Columbia Experience.”
[4]
Canadian Civil Liberties
Association and Canadian Journalists for Free Expression, “
FACT SHEET: Protection of Public
Participation Act.”
[5] The
classic SLAPP suitcase in BC was the Cedar Hills Eight. See Chris Tollefson and
Bram Rogachevsky, “ Grassroot’s Cedar Hill Eight SLAPP Back.”
No comments:
Post a Comment